jump to navigation

Why I know Quantum Physics is credible as seen on What The Bleep and The Secret January 31, 2007

Posted by quantumevolver in Biblical Truth, Brain Talk, Church/Theology, EQ, Emotional Addiction, Food for Thought, I Think, IQ, Life Coach, Life Coaching, Life Management, Millionaire Mindsets, Millionaires Life, Mind & Spirit, Mind Power Secrets, Neuroscience, Perception, Philosophy, Philosophy & Religion, Secret, Secret Mind, Secret Mind Powers, Spirituality & Religion, The Quest for Enlightenment, The Secret, TheMillionaireMentality.com, Thinking, Thinking is being (所思所想), Truth and Doctrine, What The Bleep, What is the secret?, Your Business Brain, Zen & religious & spiritual stu, a beautiful mind, achievement, and Science, brain food, brainwave entrainment, coaches, create reality, evolve, financial freedom, financial mess, financial security, financial trouble, george helou, habits of effective people, high performance, iq eq, memory exercises, memory expansion, mind coaching, mind courses, mind power, mind power coach, mindpower, mindpower coach, performance, philosophy & politics, poor performance, quantum brain, quantum business coach, quantum coach, quantum coaching, quantum critics, quantum evolver, quantum mechanics, quantum physics, quantum physics critics, quantum theory, science of success, secret mindpower, silva brainwaves, success is a science, truth.
7 comments

 

Below is a response to one of my articles discussing the power of What The Bleep and The Secret. Brandon Neuman questions the credibility of this belief:

Neuman wrote: -

your thoughts can form your life as much as a positive outlook. there is no science behind this and no credibal people agreeing with this. it is just about self-esteem and committment. if the movies help you the amazing. but if you have a mind of your own, realize the fiction when ya see it

 

George Helou said 1 week ago:

There is no science behind this? This is what you are aware of, but millions of people disagree. So its really a debate of differing points of view and I find your view, from decades of personal experience, disempowering and stifling to the spirit. Please make comments that leave room for what you do not know and what you have not read.

Regarding there being no science behind it. It depends on whether you speak to scientists who have ventured into the subatomic realm – the place where all things are created from. The ‘credible’ scientists you may be referring to still assume the observer has nothing to do with the environment. This classical paradigm has never been proven. All the experimental anomolies and disease remissions go unanswered under this model.

Then there is what I experience which backs up what I believe. This is the real challenge. when I have glimpses of the future before they happen, then moments later they play out like the movie I saw previously, quantum physics explains this while classical physics is ready to lock me up for having delusions.

One empowers me into knowing I can perceive future potentials I have created and choose to change them.

The other ridicules me and tells me I am crazy under their one theory of decoherence.

What science should I embrace since they both have logical arguments?
Always the one that empowers me. Why? Because I live and love life to the fullest knowing I matter and I am able to create a great life and not make do with the one dished out to me by fate or other people’s opinions and beliefs.

Your opinion has been shaped by the classical paradigm as mine was too – a popular world view for hundreds of years. But its 70 years outdated. Even E=mc sq. proves solid mass is in fact not solid, its energy vibrating at a particular frequency. This proves everything is energy and the Double Slit experiment by Thomas Young proves that the act of observing/measuring the building blocks of all life (sub atomic particles) changes their form and behaviour.

Since these tiny particles make up the building blocks of everything, but what you seek to believe in becomes your reality. So you ask me realise fiction when I see it – such a limited and outdated request.

These are the people who you are suggesting are not credible who are all saying the same thing: -

Albert Einstein
Max Planck
Thomas Young
David Bohm
Louis de Broglie
Erwin Schrodinger
Dr Deepak Chopra
Dr Fred Alan Wolf
Dr Candice Pert
Dr Bruce Lipton
Gregg Braden
and thousands more…

I see more proof everyday around me and through personal experience to know that What The Bleep and The Secret are simply communicating what was always the truth.

http://www.mindpowercoach.com.au/